Barnes, Melissa, and Ekaterina Tour. 2025. “Teachers’ Use of Generative AI: A ‘Dirty Little Secret’?” Language and Education, April, 1–16.
This article reports on a study of how a group of English as an Additional Language (EAL) teachers in Australia perceive and use generative AI in their teaching. The article draws on data from a larger study that examined Generative AI in the Australian education system.
The teachers were asked to respond to the following questions:
From your perspective, what are generative AI technologies?
Have you used generative AI in your teaching practices? If so, why and in what con- text? Provide examples.
From your perspective, what are the benefits of generative AI for adult EAL students? (p.6)
The analysis of responses to these questions demonstrated that teachers recognize the potential of generative AI (e.g., ChatGPT, Copilot) to enhance language learning and teaching. However, they also express concerns about when, where, and how it should be used, particularly regarding authenticity, integrity, and ethical implications.
The article discusses these findings through the lens of a framework of entangled pedagogy and teacher agency, Fawns (2022) in which technology, pedagogy, teacher agency and context mutually shape one another and that the relationship of pedagogy and technology is better understood by recognising the complexities of relational and contextual factors.
The authors argue that teacher agency is a “key concept in understanding how teachers and students interact with generative AI within learning and teaching contexts, particularly in how their individual capacities or capabilities (e.g. knowledge of generative AI), and relational and contextual factors (e.g. relationships teachers and students and/or access to generative AI) might influence their engagement with generative AI.” (p.5)
Although teachers acknowledged their agency to use AI responsibly, and their intentionality in using generative AI to create resources and to support learning, many chose to conceal their use of it due to relational and contextual pressures. The findings highlight the tension between AI’s promise to empower teachers and the challenges it poses to professional identity, pedagogical integrity, and trust in language education.
Retrievable from: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/09500782.2025.2485935#abstract